XONITEK - Endicott - Monday, November 24, 2008  
 

Flexibility and Efficiency: Can They Exist Together?
By Anders Nielsen

 

carNo Advantage to Long Runs

When I ask clients, especially shop floor supervisors and operators, whether they like setup, the answer is universally “NO!” Why? Long setups reduce efficiency and put them behind schedule. They want faster setups and longer runs. They usually cringe when I tell them that the real purpose of quick setup is more setups. It goes completely against how we have been conditioned to think about economies of scale.

 

The rationale goes like this: By reducing setup time, more setups can be performed without impacting output. Batch size is therefore reduced, without impact on unit cost (since there are many hidden costs associated with large lots and long setups that can now be avoided). This results in a shortening of the production cycle – the time it takes to cycle through all the products assigned to a machine or work center. The outcome is less Work-in-Process (WIP), shorter lead times, more opportunities to improve quality, more flexibility, and better customer service – something not available from longer runs.

 

So, it turns out that the traditional route to higher efficiency has a downside. It is one of the great ‘aha’ moments when a client realizes this.

 

Standard Setup Reduction Process

 

We want high capacity utilization, but not at the cost of large WIP inventories. Quick setup is how we get it. And the fact that setup reduction is not black magic makes this achievable for all businesses.

 

Let’s look at the steps in setup reduction. I have used the example of a stamping press setup, since this is where some of the fundamental insights for setup reduction were made.

  1. Separate internal from external – This means executing the changeover so that all those elements that can be done while the machine is still running (external) will not be mixed in with those that require the machine to be stopped (internal).
    Example: Getting tools, supplies, and material for the next job, before the current run is finished, instead of running around during the setup looking for them.
  2. Use parallel work – This means doing several tasks simultaneously, by using more people or equipment to do the work.
    Example: One person loads the new tooling, while another is programming the machine for the new job.
  3. Convert internal to external – This means redesigning tooling and machinery, to eliminate internal assembly steps and adjustments.
    Example: Mounting tooling on common plates, with built-in location stops, instead of using a tape measure to position and check if the tooling is located properly.
  4. Streamline all aspects of the setup – This means eliminating wasted motion in all aspects of the new setup process, both internal and external.
    Example: Replacing a variety of bolts and nuts with a standard one-touch (one turn, or hydraulic) clamp.

Typical reductions from these steps reduce press setup from hours, even days, to just a few minutes. Efficiency stays the same, or improves, as the production cycle is shortened.

 

Setup Reduction Graph

 

It’s not as easy as it sounds

 

There is a standard, well-known process, for reducing setup time – so, why do so many companies fail to achieve the promised benefits?

 

  1. Setup is not an isolated element. It exists in a system which, far too often, is chaotic and constantly changing. Schedulers and supervisors strive for efficiency. This leads to the paradox of having lots of inventory, but seldom having what is required (because too much time was spent making everything else). Setups are done in response to expedited orders. No wonder they take a long time, when there is no chance to plan.
  2. Change requires leadership. Those with expertise in setup cannot change the whole system, which includes not only production, but also maintenance, purchasing, quality, engineering, scheduling, and sales. Top level leadership must champion widespread change in order for setup reduction to be successful. Results will not come over night, and staying the course will challenge all leaders.

Conclusion

 

If you have large amounts of working capital tied up in inventory, today’s economic troubles should be a wake-up call to free some of it up. In the process, you will gain increased flexibility to make exactly what your customer (or a downstream operation) needs, when they need it. Setup reduction, and the stable environment that makes it possible, have taken on a new urgency.

 

 

 

Anders NielsenAnders Nielsen is the Senior Consultant with Gardiner Nielsen Associates Inc. Contact him atanders@gardinernielsen.com, 250-537-0831, or gardinernielsen.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image source: corvettefever.com

 



XONITEK Corporation is a management and technologies consulting firm with a world wide presence and a reputation for excelling in the optimization of business synchronization
.

00.028.998