| |
XONITEK - Endicott - Tuesday, September 30, 2008
|
|
How Do You Measure
Results?
There are various methods, none
always perfect, but you may find a quick review of the following seven methods
will be helpful next time you ponder that question. 1.
The Sales Method: Our favorite New
Yorker cartoon of all time shows an
overbearing executive standing behind the seated, shirt-sleeved and intimidated
staffer, both dwarfed by huge stacks of merchandise awaiting signs of demand
from the outside world. The big guy barks in the underling’s ear, “Something’s
got to go, Fenton. You, me, or this inventory — and it’s NOT going to be
me!” It’s tempting to say, “I’ll know
whether my advertising is working by whether or not it sells the darn stuff in
my ads!” But if you accept that measure, you have to give “Fenton” the control,
not just over the ads, but over the other influences on the success of your
product or service: price, availability, design, and a competitive advantage of
some sort. We have seldom met a “Fenton” who gets all of that authority from the
boss (or who even dares ask). 2.
The Show-of-Interest Method: Rather than through sales,
advertising’s effectiveness is more legitimately yard-sticked against the show
of interest that it stimulates for the
product or service. In retail, that is measured by shoes across the transom. In
business-to-business, it is measured by inquiries (phone, e-mail, Web site
visits, business show encounters). But not every business model, nor every
business category, can apply this metric to its advertising in a meaningful
manner. 3.
The Awareness/Preference Method: Boiled down to basics, the job of
advertising is to create awareness. Working with the merits of a
product or service, and throwing a light on the same for the consumer in an
environment competing for his/her attention, advertising can also be rightfully
expected to create preference. Awareness and preference are not
measured at the cash register, but rather by opinion research. That research
takes time and investment. Too few advertisers have the time-window or the
budget wherewithal to study awareness of and preference for their product or
service. Too often they are rushing to market with their messages, you might
say, in “ready-fire-aim” mode, rather than
“ready-aim-fire.” 4.
The Readership/Viewership Method: A lot of money and energy are
spent to gauge, “Is anybody watching/listening to/reading our stuff?” (Some of
these studies, especially those tied to broadcast advertising — like Nielsen,
Arbitron — are not without controversy.) In our view, the best of the
readership/viewership studies determines not just whether the audience is
exposed to the message, but “are they responding to our message?” (Compare to
the “Show-of-Interest” Method in Part One.) Fortunately, the interactivity of
the Web and other “new media” provides lots of metrics to the advertiser who is
measuring response. 5.
The Pre-Test Method: Some advertisers buy “insurance”
for their campaign investment by “pre-testing” their creative approaches against
focus group research. In theory, this provides valuable feedback on what is
working and what isn’t, before the message “goes live.” It’s a great
“ready-aim-fire” model. Yet, unfortunately, because of the cost and lead-time
involved, it is a method which is out-of-reach for many small and medium size
advertisers. 6.
The “Trial-and-Error” Method: “Trial-and-Error” has some
negative connotations, but in the real world, it’s the method that many
advertisers adopt, whether they do so knowingly or not. In fact, on the Web, the
advertiser is always in “survey” mode anyway. Trial-and-error is readily
accepted by the Web industry because the lag time between the first message and
the revised message can be hours, not weeks, nor
months. 7.
The Anecdotal Method: As much as business people love
to measure things, sometimes you find you are in a place where you are left to
measure with your gut and your heart, and not so much with your head. Sometimes
you hear someone whose opinion you value say to you, “I saw your ad in
yesterday’s paper.” Or, “That store of yours, weren’t you on TV last night?”
Perhaps, “that Web site you guys put up is really neat; it helped me a lot. Keep
the good stuff coming.” This sort of anecdotal feedback can help you know that
you are indeed getting through to an audience that’s important. Not to mention
that it can be a real morale booster for you and your organization. “Yes, we are
making a dent, after all, with this advertising,” you might hear yourself
say. Well, Fenton is safe for today (the big guy has left early for the golf course). But, armed with our “Seven Methods of Measuring Results,” Fenton is “ready-to-rumble” with him when his shadow next darkens the doorway.
|
|
|
|